[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

4 or smaller digit ASNs

Subject: 4 or smaller digit ASNs
From: valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu (valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 16:58:52 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAGOa4nOgoZ1huFcQFHUKi_TpPgaEiuR2L=hFy5_qn84QunoAkw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BY2PR20MB03906E947DF0EFA726E369C3C24B0@BY2PR20MB0390.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <[email protected]> <CAGOa4nOgoZ1huFcQFHUKi_TpPgaEiuR2L=hFy5_qn84QunoAkw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:55:35 -0500, Steve Jones said:
> as i understand it, you cant do bgp at all under 5

AS1312 does BGP quite nicely... Not sure what you meant there, unless the
text/plain lost the <font=sarcasm> tags...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 486 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20171012/da809065/attachment.sig>

References:
- 4 or smaller digit ASNs
  - From: James at arenalgroup.co (James Breeden)
- 4 or smaller digit ASNs
  - From: mel at beckman.org (Mel Beckman)
- 4 or smaller digit ASNs
  - From: thatoneguysteve at gmail.com (Steve Jones)

Prev by Date: replacing compromised biometric authenticators
Next by Date: replacing compromised biometric authenticators
Previous by thread: 4 or smaller digit ASNs
Next by thread: 4 or smaller digit ASNs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread