[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RFC 1918 network range choices

Subject: RFC 1918 network range choices
From: jra at baylink.com (Jay R. Ashworth)
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 14:40:57 +0000 (UTC)

Does anyone have a pointer to an *authoritative* source on why

10/8
172.16/12 and
192.168/16 

were the ranges chosen to enshrine in the RFC?  Came up elsewhere, and I can't 
find a good citation either.

To list or I'll summarize.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra at baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info          2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727 647 1274

Follow-Ups:
- RFC 1918 network range choices
  - From: akshay at mongodb.com (Akshay Kumar)
- RFC 1918 network range choices
  - From: jra at baylink.com (Jay R. Ashworth)
- RFC 1918 network range choices
  - From: jerry at jtcloe.net (Jerry Cloe)
- RFC 1918 network range choices
  - From: dfk at ripe.net (Daniel Karrenberg)

Prev by Date: Charity IT Pulse :) one more sleep till Bytenight Action for Children 2017
Next by Date: RFC 1918 network range choices
Previous by thread: Charity IT Pulse :) one more sleep till Bytenight Action for Children 2017
Next by thread: RFC 1918 network range choices
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread