[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Carrier classification
On 5/15/17 10:01 PM, Ken Chase wrote:
> so cogent has no routes to some amount of v6? ie no routes
> to some prefixes?
it's easy enough to test
Test Router Location Hostname / IP Address
2607:f8b0:4005:801::200e
Go!
Tue May 16 04:00:27.010 UTC
% Network not in table
http://www.cogentco.com/en/network/looking-glass
They're not the sole provider with a hole in their routing table, nor is
that the only hole. I would probably choose not to single home behind
any nominally SFI carrier, but on the other hand how useful such carrier
is in the first place has a lot to do with can they offload the traffic
you choose to send them, which is a different problem and should be
assessed accordingly.
> /kc
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 07:56:14PM -0700, Large Hadron Collider said:
> >My terminology of tiers are:
> >
> >Tier 1 - is in few or no major disputes, has no transit, and is able to
> >access over three nines percent of the internet
> >
> >Tier 2 - as Tier 1, but has transit.
> >
> >Cogent is neither on v6, and I have no clue about v4.
> >
> >HE is probably Tier 2 on v4, and is Tier 1 on v6.
> >
> >
> >On 15/05/2017 19:27, Ca By wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 6:44 PM Bradley Huffaker <bhuffake at caida.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 09:24:18AM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
> >>>> Nowadays, I'm hearing this less and less, but it's not completely gone.
> >>> Putting aside the question of their importance, there is a small number
> >>> of ISPs that do no pay for transit. If you don't call them Tier 1, what
> >>> do you call them? Transit Free Providers (TFPs)?
> >>
> >> I think the broader and more relevant question is -- Does it matter who
> >> pays who ? Why name an irrelevant characteristic?
> >>
> >> Cogent may not buy transit but i would not purchase their service since
> >> they fail to have full internet reach (google and HE)
> >>
> >> And xyz incumbent may have a poor network, but they may get free peering or
> >> may get paid-peering because of their incumbent / monopoly status... that
> >> is not a reason for me to purchase from them or think they are an elite
> >> tier 1.
> >>
> >> The dynamica of the day are more around reach and quality, not some legacy
> >> measure of how market-failure facilitate anti-social behavior
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> --
> >>> the value of a world model is not how accurately it captures reality
> >>> but how often it leads us to take appropriate action
> >>>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20170515/7a8b6f91/attachment.pgp>