[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Old Long Haul Versus New Long Haul Fiber
- Subject: Old Long Haul Versus New Long Haul Fiber
- From: rod.beck at unitedcablecompany.com (Rod Beck)
- Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 17:24:09 +0000
- In-reply-to: <1855197592.6512.1493743748722.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
- References: <[email protected]> <CA+2a=LzsZ3Z6fPsOodMXUP3XBEK+tazYPBo3CmKsF6E6HiYhVQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>, <1855197592.6512.1493743748722.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
I am curious how much of a performance gap exists between new long haul fiber and fiber laid during the Great Boom from 1998-2001. We are very close to 20 years.
I assume there are two dimensions, namely bit carrying capacity of an individual wave and total bandwidth capacity of a fiber pair. I have been told and readily believe that fiber improvements do make a difference. But I have no sense of magnitudes. My impression is that the 1998-2001 fiber probably cannot handle above 100 gig waves and about 14 terabits per fiber pair at least on Trans-Atlantic cables.
- R.
www.crosslakefibre.ca<http://www.crosslakefibre.ca>
www.unitedcablecompany.com<http://www.s>