[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Free access to measurement network
- Subject: Free access to measurement network
- From: josmon at rigozsaurus.com (John Osmon)
- Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 16:19:22 -0700
- In-reply-to: <1972630908.3367.1513456988082.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
- References: <CAA6dEZNd3nRnoXMfRs0kNWxtepvVTEeYBV3=mW0-rCeOg6+dEA@mail.gmail.com> <CAM3TTh2Uh1w6PVpXvYueTvwDDDfOaozY6N8iJFH0HJ5Lm0KCOg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1894627970.2856.1513437766962.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> <CAD8GWsv=mNHm2Y29MMLs3igM8Ay6Je1_W2MDsn2BFjKWEwdrOg@mail.gmail.com> <1972630908.3367.1513456988082.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
> My point was that consumers voted out thousands of independents by
> taking service from incumbents instead of independents. Thousands have
> closed up shop. Where independents are available, it's still tough
> getting customers if the incumbents have a service that mostly works
> (over say 5 to 10 megs), even if the independent offers service
> comparable to the incumbent's advertisements.
In my neck of the woods, most independents only sold layer 3 services.
and depended upon others for layer 2 services. The independents had
a booming business with those conditions and consumers had an array of
choices for ISPs.
Then, the layer 2 operators started offering combined layer 2/3 services
at a price point below the layer 2 only price needed to get to the
independents. Unsurprisingly, the consumers flocked to the cheaper
services.
I've always felt if a company used a public right of way to reach a
consumer, they should be prohibited from being a layer 3 provider.
Or, at a minimum, they need to sell layer 2 services to themselves at
the same price they charge others. I've known lots of people that would
be happy to compete with the big boys under those circumstances.