[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32

Subject: Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32
From: Ryan.Hamel at quadranet.com (Ryan Hamel)
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 03:13:57 +0000

Greetings,

A colleague of mine has static routed 172.16.0.0/32 to a usable IP address, to have a single known IP address be static routed to a regions closest server. While I understand the IP address does work (pings and what not), I don't feel this should be the proper IP address used, but something more feasible like a usable IP in a dedicated range (172.31.0.0/24 for example).

I would to hear everyone's thoughts on this, as this the first IP address in an RFC1918 range.

Thanks,

--
Ryan Hamel
ryan.hamel at quadranet.com | +1 (888) 578-2372
QuadraNet, Inc. | Dedicated Servers, Colocation, Cloud

Follow-Ups:
- Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32
  - From: hf0002+nanog at uah.edu (Hunter Fuller)
- Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32
  - From: valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu (valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32
  - From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)

Prev by Date: Poor speed to AWS
Next by Date: FCC Seeks Comment on 2017 Hurricane Season Response Efforts
Previous by thread: Poor speed to AWS
Next by thread: Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread