BCP38 adoption "incentives"?

Subject: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?
From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:24:41 +0100
In-reply-to: <2028709844.551.1475089548255.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
References: <[email protected]> <460080974.208.1475008352299.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> <cb692134c0ad48a1aac490728027b4b4@SC58MEXGP032.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com> <2142792719.496.1475009488675.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> <[email protected]> <2028709844.551.1475089548255.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>

Mike Hammett wrote:
> Is that common in CMTSes or just in certain ones? 

it's a mandatory part of the docsis3 specification.

Nick

References:
- BCP38 adoption "incentives"?
  - From: list at satchell.net (Stephen Satchell)
- BCP38 adoption "incentives"?
  - From: nanog at ics-il.net (Mike Hammett)
- BCP38 adoption "incentives"?
  - From: Andrew.White2 at charter.com (White, Andrew)
- BCP38 adoption "incentives"?
  - From: nanog at ics-il.net (Mike Hammett)
- BCP38 adoption "incentives"?
  - From: wesgeorge at puck.nether.net (Wesley George)
- BCP38 adoption "incentives"?
  - From: nanog at ics-il.net (Mike Hammett)