[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Request for comment -- BCP38
- Subject: Request for comment -- BCP38
- From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- Date: 26 Sep 2016 18:03:55 -0000
- In-reply-to: <CAO1bj=bQE_4YvefVcPSio_TCezWMd8NwPSjdmsJT1spSHftwhQ@mail.gmail.com>
>>>
>>> If you have links from both ISP A and ISP B and decide to send traffic
>>> out ISP A's link sourced from addresses ISP B allocated to you, ISP A
>>> *should* drop that traffic on the floor.
>
>> This is a legitimate and interesting use case that is broken by BCP38.
>
>I don't agree that this is legitimate.
>
>Also we're talking about typical mom & pop home users here.
There are SOHO modems that will fall back to a second connection if
the primary one fails, but that's not what we're talking about here.
The customers I'm talking about are businesses large enough to have
two dedicated upstreams, and a chunk of address spaced SWIP'ed from
each. Some run BGP but I get the impression as likely as not they
have static routes to the two upstreams.
For people who missed it the last time, I said $50K/mo, not $50/mo. Letters matter.
R's,
John