[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Should abuse mailboxes have quotas?
- Subject: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas?
- From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:47:57 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
In a message written on Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:03:11AM -0700, Stephen Satchell wrote:
> For the last couple of weeks, every single abuse mail I've tried to send
> to networks in a very short list of countries has bounced back with
> "mailbox exceeds quota". I take this to mean that there isn't someone
> actively reading, acting on, and deleting e-mail from abuse@<whomever>.
Are there any ISP's left that read and respond to abuse@ in a timely
fashion? I haven't seen one in at least a decade. Maybe I e-mail the
wrong ones.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20161027/b68fff79/attachment.pgp>