[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Spitballing IoT Security

Subject: Spitballing IoT Security
From: mike.meredith at port.ac.uk (Mike Meredith)
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:04:55 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:59:00 +0200, Eliot Lear <lear at ofcourseimright.com>
may have written:
> Well yes.  uPnP is a problem precisely because it is some random device
> asserting on its own that it can be trusted to do what it wants.  Had

Follow-Ups:
- Spitballing IoT Security
  - From: mel at beckman.org (Mel Beckman)
- Spitballing IoT Security
  - From: lear at ofcourseimright.com (Eliot Lear)

References:
- Spitballing IoT Security
  - From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette)
- Spitballing IoT Security
  - From: jfmezei_nanog at vaxination.ca (Jean-Francois Mezei)
- Spitballing IoT Security
  - From: lear at ofcourseimright.com (Eliot Lear)

Prev by Date: Spitballing IoT Security
Next by Date: Spitballing IoT Security
Previous by thread: Spitballing IoT Security
Next by thread: Spitballing IoT Security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread