[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Death of the Internet, Film at 11
- Subject: Death of the Internet, Film at 11
- From: list at satchell.net (Stephen Satchell)
- Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 14:58:47 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAJL_ZMMQyqLMhc3t5tR2CpfoV5yTzUSyTMD-B=291B04xhcV+A@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <430335629.3600.1477139691877.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> <[email protected]> <CAJL_ZMMQyqLMhc3t5tR2CpfoV5yTzUSyTMD-B=291B04xhcV+A@mail.gmail.com>
That's what VPNs are for.
On 10/22/2016 10:04 AM, jim deleskie wrote:
> It is also likely the desired use case. In my office I like to be able to
> login when needed when on the road, when the alarm company calls me at 2am
> for a false alarm so I don't have to get someone else out of bed to have
> them dispatched to check on the site.
>
> -jim
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Chris Boyd <cboyd at gizmopartners.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> On Oct 22, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> "taken all necessary steps to insure that none of the numerous specific
>> types of CCVT thingies that Krebs and others identified"
>>>
>>> Serious question... how?
>>
>> Putting them behind a firewall without general Internet access seems to
>> work for us. We have a lot of cheap IP cameras in our facility and none of
>> them can reach the net. But this is probably a bit beyond the capabilities
>> of the general home user.
>>
>> ?Chris
>>
>>