[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Dyn DDoS this AM?
- Subject: Dyn DDoS this AM?
- From: josh at kyneticwifi.com (Josh Reynolds)
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 19:10:45 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAC6=tfaoxubpqYBpKzzxkAy_jka_2ATBkuNZ1ANv=8Qs_qrEpg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAC1-dt=AK-f7AeeqnM4k3O0Ev+2bAbpJMObcmV7vfQp2Mf8kmA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAOMvUQc0eDVa=UUhUQOZbbyfQYk--oTumO8p_TE3NUMH--RnKQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC6=tfaoxubpqYBpKzzxkAy_jka_2ATBkuNZ1ANv=8Qs_qrEpg@mail.gmail.com>
Ah, disregard. I see what you're saying now.
Yes, I can see how that would be problematic.
On Oct 21, 2016 6:40 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <josh at kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
> Ansible would be a decent start.
>
> On Oct 21, 2016 5:26 PM, "David Birdsong" <david at imgix.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>>
>> > anyone who relies on a single dns provider is just asking for stuff such
>> > as this.
>> >
>> > randy
>> >
>>
>> I'd love to hear how others are handling the overhead of managing two dns
>> providers. Every time we brainstorm on it, we see it as blackhole of eng
>> effort WRT to keeping them in sync and and then waiting for TTLs to cut an
>> entire delegation over.
>>
>