[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

pay.gov and IPv6

Subject: pay.gov and IPv6
From: sean at donelan.com (Sean Donelan)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:03:58 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAD8GWsvetSmn1ssFk_AdTtKheog0e1ZfXRLd11FpkbPJGHM6hw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Why the hell should validating resolver have to work around the
> crap you guys are using?  DO YOUR JOBS which is to use RFC COMPLIANT
> servers.  You get PAID to do DNS because people think you are
> compentent to do the job.  Evidence shows otherwise.
>
> https://ednscomp.isc.org/compliance/gov-full-report.html show the broken
> servers for .gov.  It isn't hard to check.


Engineer complains the universe doesn't match his assumptions.

References:
- pay.gov and IPv6
  - From: carl at five-ten-sg.com (Carl Byington)
- pay.gov and IPv6
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- pay.gov and IPv6
  - From: ler762 at gmail.com (Lee)
- pay.gov and IPv6
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)

Prev by Date: pay.gov and IPv6
Next by Date: Amsterdam/London Underesea Cables
Previous by thread: pay.gov and IPv6
Next by thread: pay.gov and IPv6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread