[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

Subject: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 18:03:18 +0900
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAGy+NY0R+9fBSRH5RKNc7mp4aF4B3K0c+CTwVuSakHsfF8r0ng@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

> Running multi-level IS-IS means you need to plan your L1/L2
> intersections

as painful as ospf

in a research rack with more than one router, i run is-is.

randy

Follow-Ups:
- [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)

References:
- OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
  - From: main at kipsang.com (Michael Bullut)
- OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
  - From: web at typo.org (Wayne Bouchard)
- OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)

Prev by Date: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
Next by Date: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
Previous by thread: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
Next by thread: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread