[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

About inetnum "ownership"

Subject: About inetnum "ownership"
From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 06:31:42 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CAP-guGUuJhdmZj27agTbQDk=Y+=S11GmmCxo6D9uEPHouZKTiw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGWfo6cCHqN2KAKTW1xZ2L=O0WreeuU2VcF=te-nS4SA1Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:46 AM, Jonas Bjork <mr.jonas.bjork at me.com> wrote:
> shouldn't the same logic of ownership of DNS domain names apply to inetnum address space?

Hi Jonas,

A trademark owner invoking the UDRP generally is able to exclude
anyone else that can't present an equally valid claim to the name.
That's why the vast majority of squatted names are for sale at just
under the cost of invoking the UDRP.

Regards,
Bill Herrin

-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>

References:
- About inetnum "ownership"
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- About inetnum "ownership"
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- About inetnum "ownership"
  - From: kauer at biplane.com.au (Karl Auer)
- About inetnum "ownership"
  - From: mr.jonas.bjork at me.com (Jonas Bjork)

Prev by Date: AWS Direct Connect - Peering VPCs to Tier 1's and MPLS
Next by Date: About inetnum "ownership"
Previous by thread: About inetnum "ownership"
Next by thread: About inetnum "ownership"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread