[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention

Subject: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention
From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:10:58 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <BL2PR09MB11234069E707505B417F29D6845C0@BL2PR09MB1123.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAL9jLaa_O4v4jo7SMiKrgCqXhDfrkVfq5T1fGkyYYN3QxLeYyA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAL9jLabc8ONCHERsOM=nkkBntJgwzCqzUm2Lw4Uwuf3Y7k-=gQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>


On 10/Jun/16 19:19, Hugo Slabbert wrote:

>  
>
> Unless it's mitigated by you accepting customer A's prefixes from any
> transits you have,

This.

Mark.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20160610/6788a64e/attachment.pgp>

References:
- intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention
  - From: kotikalapudi.sriram at nist.gov (Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed))
- intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention
  - From: job at instituut.net (Job Snijders)
- intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention
  - From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention
  - From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention
  - From: hugo at slabnet.com (Hugo Slabbert)

Prev by Date: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention
Next by Date: Netflix banning HE tunnels [really: IPv6 adoption]
Previous by thread: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention
Next by thread: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread