AW: AW: AW: Verizon and Level3 DNS flush

[JJaritsch at anexia-it.com (Jürgen Jaritsch)]

> Altering routing and/or adding capacity/capabilities to the existing infrastructure is generally better

Yes ... but as mentioned in one of the off-list replies: the original DNS are from a 3rd party and they had no chance to expand resources ...


best regards

J?rgen Jaritsch
Head of Network & Infrastructure

ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH


-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] Im Auftrag von Roland Dobbins
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. Juni 2016 11:30
An: nanog at nanog.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Verizon and Level3 DNS flush


On Jun 2, 2016, at 3:42 PM, J?rgen Jaritsch <JJaritsch at anexia-it.com> wrote:

> it IS expected behavior that traffic will switch over to the new DNS.

Altering routing and/or adding capacity/capabilities to the existing infrastructure is generally better, whenever possible, due to the cache-flushing challenges you're now experiencing.

Sometimes it isn't possible, of course.

-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net>