IPv6 deployment excuses

[swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)]

On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Baldur Norddahl wrote:

> The two other technologies mentioned do the same as MAP more or less, 
> but both requires carrier NAT, which is expensive for the ISP and has a 
> lack of control as seen from the end user point of view (no port 
> forwarding etc).

What it does however, is make things like GRE work. Some are surprised 
that there is actually non A+P protocols being used by customers. For 
instance legacy PPTP uses this, so some business VPNs run into problem 
with MAP or LW4o6.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se