[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 traffic percentages?
- Subject: IPv6 traffic percentages?
- From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 07:20:37 -0500
- In-reply-to: <trinity-29af3653-7205-4513-9c8b-32076b2aa151-1453292082537@3capp-mailcom-lxa07>
- References: <trinity-29af3653-7205-4513-9c8b-32076b2aa151-1453292082537@3capp-mailcom-lxa07>
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 7:14 AM, nanog-isp at mail.com wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Would those with IPv6 deployments kindly share some statistics on their percentage of IPv6 traffic?
>
> Bonus points for sharing top IPv6 sources. Anything else than the usual suspects, Google/YouTube, Netflix and Facebook?
>
> Some public information I've found so far:
> - Comcast around 25% IPv6 traffic ( http://www.lightreading.com/ethernet-ip/ip-protocols-software/facebook-ipv6-is-a-real-world-big-deal/a/d-id/718395 )
> - Comcast has over 1 Tb/s (of mostly YouTube traffic) over IPv6 ( http://corporate.comcast.com/comcast-voices/comcast-reaches-key-milestone-in-launch-of-ipv6-broadband-network )
> - Swisscom 26% IPv6 traffic, 60% YouTube ( http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog27/p/01_Martin_Gysi.pdf )
>
> I'd be very much interested in hearing from smaller ISPs, especially those having a very limited number of IPv4 addresses and/or running out.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jared
^^^^^^^
Not me ;)
I currently see around 56.4:1 with the timing of peaks the same in v4 and v6.
I am talking with a few local wireless ISPs in my area that are going to be running fiber, they currently provide a NAT44 experience and I?m pushing them to deploy IPv6 to preserve their CGN state. This is mostly an exercise in them making the time to enable it vs needing convincing.
- [another] Jared