[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
de-peering for security sake
- Subject: de-peering for security sake
- From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:53:40 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAD6AjGTf1YeGMykikZxDnTsLnNbZh=YYjOw1hj=hLeA32hD+9A@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAN9qwJ8pWP0SSJFg9e2-9hHsFV16bViQ9_OVQ4wbGXgqtBUBMw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7AVPVpJqDcB_A4w_VTxnb14Eqh1TnpRWxN8MJaJ5_h2ww@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAGbD49qqRdt8kU79fC7yS2VWj1MweO8+1R80_NW2oqp9rWzznw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAD6AjGTf1YeGMykikZxDnTsLnNbZh=YYjOw1hj=hLeA32hD+9A@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 05:43:56AM -0800, Ca By wrote:
> I see a great deal of folks on nanog clamoring to buy ddos gear. Packets
> are starting to become like spam email, where 90% are pure rubbish, and
> us good guys have to spend a lot of money and time sorting signal from
> noise.
I've said this many times: abuse does not magically fall out of the sky.
It comes from hosts, on networks, run by people. It is time -- well
past time -- to hold those people *personally* acountable.
Not doing so leaves us where we are today: millions -- heck, hundreds
of millions -- of dollars are being spent on defenses THAT WOULD NOT
BE NECESSARY if those people performed their jobs at a mere baseline
level of competence and diligence.
---rsk