[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
TransPacific Partnership
- Subject: TransPacific Partnership
- From: mhoppes at indigowireless.com (Matt Hoppes)
- Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 19:07:12 -0500
- In-reply-to: <925F280C2DCC9D409D202D3E79C01E12105B0B58@MAIL.connectivityit.com.au>
- References: <[email protected]> <925F280C2DCC9D409D202D3E79C01E12105B0B58@MAIL.connectivityit.com.au>
My understanding was if it all goes through here in the US as proposed ISPs would have to provide real time monitoring of data Not as part of CALEA but as part of NSA surveilance.
> On Jan 3, 2016, at 18:54, Tom Berryman <Tom at connectivityit.com.au> wrote:
>
> G'Day Matt,
>
> I'm here in Australia - and yes we are all well aware of the "benefits" of the TPP.
>
> What do you mean by burned?
> As in the additional accounting and administration overhead of doing business with operators in TPP participating countries?
>
> Also, will you be attending PTC?
>
>
> Regards,
> Tom Berryman
>
>
> Tom Berryman | CTO
> Connectivity I.T. PTY LTD
> ABN: 41128650635
>
> 1300 22 46 00 (+61356224600) | tom at connectivityit.com.au | AS-58511
> www.connectivityit.com.au | facebook.com/connectivityit | twitter.com/connectivityit
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
> Sent: Monday, 4 January 2016 10:32 AM
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: TransPacific Partnership
>
> Has anyone heard any more regarding the TPP and the proposed additional monitoring burdens that would be put on ISPs?