[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

de-peering for security sake

Subject: de-peering for security sake
From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 12:44:34 +0900
In-reply-to: <CAJj1h3EUQoRsrQdH-9XV3P01aLG9bsQ-F0t9Q9zPgP1AbOmFQQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <CAN9qwJ8pWP0SSJFg9e2-9hHsFV16bViQ9_OVQ4wbGXgqtBUBMw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7AVPVpJqDcB_A4w_VTxnb14Eqh1TnpRWxN8MJaJ5_h2ww@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAGbD49qqRdt8kU79fC7yS2VWj1MweO8+1R80_NW2oqp9rWzznw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAJj1h3EUQoRsrQdH-9XV3P01aLG9bsQ-F0t9Q9zPgP1AbOmFQQ@mail.gmail.com>

> Purposefully hosting an "inflammatory" site that the Russians or
> Chinese object to is a valid way to get your AS null routed inside
> those countries.  Same goes for Turkey, India, Australia...

luckily this is not true in the US.  oh wait.

>> We really need to ask if China and Russia for that matter will not
>> take abuse reports seriously why allow them to network to the
>> internet ?

luckily all american and ukranian isps respond to abuse in minutes.

moving right along ...

randy

References:
- de-peering for security sake
  - From: richard.hesse at weebly.com (Richard Hesse)

Prev by Date: de-peering for security sake
Next by Date: TransPacific Partnership
Previous by thread: de-peering for security sake
Next by thread: de-peering for security sake
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread