[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk
- Subject: Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk
- From: hank at efes.iucc.ac.il (Hank Nussbacher)
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:04:42 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <CAL9jLaYy33H297R=E6GLeBisJH1XQTnWjROYyC4jSuOcM=TDAQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAL9jLaYy33H297R=E6GLeBisJH1XQTnWjROYyC4jSuOcM=TDAQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> ?different providers, different entrance facilities in the building(s),
> different conduits out of the area... and hope that somewhere along the
> path providerA and B didn't share conduit or capacity-swap you to a single
> path :)?
>
I would suggest also different provider equipment. If one provider uses J
find your second provider that uses C.
Also don't be seduced by a provider that offers 2 disparate paths, using
two totally different systems. I remember years ago AT&T's ATM and FR
systems both died nationwide due to some equipment bug.
Also providers lie either intentionally or by mistake. If they state a
circuit is protected, it might be this month, but next month it may not
be. You may only discover this 3 years from now when the circuit dies,
and the provider is happy to pay the SLA penalty which is far less than
the 3 year cost of a protected vs a non-protected circuit.
-Hank