[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk
- Subject: Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing risk
- From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:07:57 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAL9jLaYy33H297R=E6GLeBisJH1XQTnWjROYyC4jSuOcM=TDAQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAL9jLaYy33H297R=E6GLeBisJH1XQTnWjROYyC4jSuOcM=TDAQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/Apr/16 14:58, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
> ?so (as bill points out) plan to localize subnets to each pop. (do not
> number customers in pop1 in the same /24 as customers in pop2)?
Yes.
May lead to some global de-aggregation, but can't really avoid that.
>
> ?be aware of gre / ip-in-ip forwarding limitations?
I wouldn't touch it, myself.
I'd rather devote the sleepless nights to fixing the backhaul.
>
>
> ?different providers, different entrance facilities in the
> building(s), different conduits out of the area... and hope that
> somewhere along the path providerA and B didn't share conduit or
> capacity-swap you to a single path :)?
+1.
Mark.