[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Prefix hijacking by AS20115

Subject: Prefix hijacking by AS20115
From: sethm at rollernet.us (Seth Mattinen)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:51:01 -0700
In-reply-to: <D2301493.B185B%[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CAP-guGWo9xg3uqBC4oae52QvQ9m0pr=+KBZSfnB7yVJxqwpp3g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <D2300873.B17EE%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <D2301493.B185B%[email protected]>

On 9/29/15 8:18 AM, Rampley Jr, Jim F wrote:
 >
> This issue was caused by a hung BGP process which was resolved last night.
>   Nothing nefarious.  No static configuration nailed up, no BGP highjacking
> purposely done. ;)
>


Is there a Cisco bug ID?

~Seth

Follow-Ups:
- Prefix hijacking by AS20115
  - From: digitallystoned at gmail.com (N M)

References:
- Prefix hijacking by AS20115
  - From: sethm at rollernet.us (Seth Mattinen)
- Prefix hijacking by AS20115
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Prefix hijacking by AS20115
  - From: sethm at rollernet.us (Seth Mattinen)
- Prefix hijacking by AS20115
  - From: hannigan at gmail.com (Martin Hannigan)
- Prefix hijacking by AS20115
  - From: sethm at rollernet.us (Seth Mattinen)
- Prefix hijacking by AS20115
  - From: jim.rampley at charter.com (Rampley Jr, Jim F)
- Prefix hijacking by AS20115
  - From: sethm at rollernet.us (Seth Mattinen)
- Prefix hijacking by AS20115
  - From: jim.rampley at charter.com (Rampley Jr, Jim F)

Prev by Date: Do you have INOC-DBA set up? (was: Re: PCH.net questions and thoughts - Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115)
Next by Date: PCH.net questions and thoughts - Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115
Previous by thread: Prefix hijacking by AS20115
Next by thread: Prefix hijacking by AS20115
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread