[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Uptick in spam

Subject: Uptick in spam
From: larrysheldon at cox.net (Larry Sheldon)
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:45:20 -0500
In-reply-to: <CALA5tJJS5jfDNZZcUGwykKzFPwLQyejeOVC5oLZGUXt_GxRrCw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEZw2byBWRdAk2WWqGAKVs5On6rFQO7k83L-F1AwY6q1kMrgmQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CALeqL2csBiA9VKWKWZT4Jwfnmc7zzJmWrX5g8vX2HtGdi5DE0Q@mail.gmail.com> <CY1PR07MB220030CEAAC32E266AC9B9D6FA230@CY1PR07MB2200.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CALA5tJJS5jfDNZZcUGwykKzFPwLQyejeOVC5oLZGUXt_GxRrCw@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/26/2015 22:26, Andrew Kirch wrote:
> not even close to more discussing than from the original spam.  Not even
> close.

Not even in the same order of magnitude, I don't think.



-- 
sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

References:
- Uptick in spam
  - From: anthony.kasza at gmail.com (anthony kasza)
- Uptick in spam
  - From: paras at protrafsolutions.com (Paras)
- Uptick in spam
  - From: ian.w.smith at gmail.com (Ian Smith)
- Uptick in spam
  - From: Steve.Mikulasik at civeo.com (Steve Mikulasik)
- Uptick in spam
  - From: trelane at trelane.net (Andrew Kirch)

Prev by Date: The spam is real
Next by Date: thank you Re: spam smackdown?
Previous by thread: Uptick in spam
Next by thread: Uptick in spam
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread