[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Why is NANOG not being blacklisted like any other provider that sent 500 spam messages in 3 days?

Subject: Why is NANOG not being blacklisted like any other provider that sent 500 spam messages in 3 days?
From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:47:29 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CALA5tJ+0THefn0ShY8Tkrd34U9dift-TVPUbXV4ibQte25ADhg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Gopher or Archie anyone? These newfangled things confuse me. http://youtu.be/V8YBuwmtzYE

Jared Mauch

> On Oct 26, 2015, at 7:33 PM, Alan Buxey <A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> I was looking out for the sub-Reddit thread ;)
> 
> alan

References:
- Why is NANOG not being blacklisted like any other provider that sent 500 spam messages in 3 days?
  - From: trelane at trelane.net (Andrew Kirch)
- Why is NANOG not being blacklisted like any other provider that sent 500 spam messages in 3 days?
  - From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
- Why is NANOG not being blacklisted like any other provider that sent 500 spam messages in 3 days?
  - From: A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk (Alan Buxey)

Prev by Date: NANOG list attack
Next by Date: NANOG list attack
Previous by thread: Why is NANOG not being blacklisted like any other provider that sent 500 spam messages in 3 days?
Next by thread: Why is NANOG not being blacklisted like any other provider that sent 500 spam messages in 3 days?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread