[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IGP choice
- Subject: IGP choice
- From: dcorbe at hammerfiber.com (Daniel Corbe)
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 23:55:09 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (marcel's message of "Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:57:01 +0200")
- References: <[email protected]>
"marcel.duregards at yahoo.fr" <marcel.duregards at yahoo.fr> writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Anybody from Yahoo to share experience on IGP choice ?
> IS-IS vs OSPF, why did you switch from one to the other, for what reason ?
> Same question could apply to other ISP, I'd like to heard some
> international ISP/carriers design choice, please.
>
> Thank in advance,
> Best regards,
> -Marcel
I worked a project as recently as 2009 where we tried to connect two
6509s together over a tunnel interface and wanted to extend Area 0
across it and couldn't because it was a limitation of the version of IOS
we were running at the time.
That forced us to use isis.
It was a decision based on pragmatism rather than design choice; and we
were a small operator, too. The choice of an interior routing protocol
really doesn't have much implication for small operators.
- References:
- IGP choice
- From: marcel.duregards at yahoo.fr (marcel.duregards at yahoo.fr)