[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IP-Echelon Compliance
- Subject: IP-Echelon Compliance
- From: sean at donelan.com (Sean Donelan)
- Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:35:58 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <CAL9jLabp83XEwFE0SSx9KVOaVb78j_=5chtgOsCnSeC3hE1SiQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAPkb-7AGHn3zceFT+E5DPsYN8RBxt_G4hxi4xJDtSpKGn3MFqw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLabp83XEwFE0SSx9KVOaVb78j_=5chtgOsCnSeC3hE1SiQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> fairly certian that nothing ip-echelon sends is ever valid...
> or there's enough 'clearly you are joking' mail from them that anyone
> who ends up in court for 'ip echelon violations' could simply subpeona
> their isp for 'other complaints from ip echelon' and show the judge:
> "Clearly these folk are on the good crack, case closed due to
> reasonable doubt."
procmailrc is your friend. however far your lawyer lets you go.