[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Quick Update on the North American BCOP Efforts
- Subject: Quick Update on the North American BCOP Efforts
- From: yardiel at gmail.com (Yardiel Fuentes)
- Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:16:13 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAPYK2_xwC=1QXWBedt1qY7pafs7cwMyMnAG8hHoneJJ6uvd-8g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAC1-dtmanO4va+xBtOe7UfsZEOr6n-axAkij6yYqriyyZqWwMQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAC1-dt=WURS+r6aExJxbL16bL09-XaVvbkVu07H49UL_b22=tg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPYK2_xwC=1QXWBedt1qY7pafs7cwMyMnAG8hHoneJJ6uvd-8g@mail.gmail.com>
I wouldn't call it an issue.. it is precisely the potential multiplicity of
practices which gives strong value to a "best Common Operational Practice"
... that was the experience working towards ratifying a DDoS/DoS BCOP ...
and the BCOP keeps improving... all for the benefit of the Net Ops
community...
Yardiel Fuentes
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Harald Koch <chk at pobox.com> wrote:
> On 1 October 2015 at 00:37, Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Those that have the information are mostly busy
> > engineers, for whom writing documentation is not their favorite thing.
> >
>
> There's also the issue that if you ask two NANOG engineers a technical
> question you'll get (at least) five answers...
>
--
Yardiel Fuentes