[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Frontier: Blocking port 22 because of illegal files?
- Subject: Frontier: Blocking port 22 because of illegal files?
- From: rea+nanog at grid.kiae.ru (Eygene Ryabinkin)
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:21:45 +0300
- In-reply-to: <CAEE+rGqimJYAfgmzm9AJ72+gcmJxfZLM7n4Rf03vynxKN=Qfeg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAEE+rGqimJYAfgmzm9AJ72+gcmJxfZLM7n4Rf03vynxKN=Qfeg@mail.gmail.com>
Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 07:31:35PM -0700, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
> Just a friendly heads-up to anyone from Frontier who might be
> listening, I have a few additional ports you may wish to block:
>
> 80 - Allows users to use Google to search for illegal files
> 443 - Allows users to use Google to search for illegal files in a secure manner
> 69 - Allows users to trivially transfer illegal files
> 3389 - Allows users to connect to unlicensed Windows machines
> 179 - Allows users to exchange routes to illegal file shares
> 53 - Allows people to look up illegal names
Can't help to add that there are
- port 21 that allow users to give commands to examine
the existence and initiate transfers of illegal files;
- ports 1025 - 65535 that allow users to create data streams
to actually transfer illegal files in an (oh my) passive mode.
;)
--
Eygene Ryabinkin, National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be
a violent psychopath who knows where you live.