[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Getting hit hard by CHINANET

Subject: Getting hit hard by CHINANET
From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Roland Dobbins)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:04:19 +0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CA+w+2f9vMAgFTTH=KVZANdQjTuRdyNH4yBVV9vhDRqGFFOCB_g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 18 Mar 2015, at 17:00, Roland Dobbins wrote:

> This is not an optimal approach, and most providers are unlikely to 
> engage in such behavior due to its potential negative impact (I'm 
> assuming you mean via S/RTBH and/or flowspec).

Here's one counterexample:

<https://ripe68.ripe.net/presentations/176-RIPE68_JSnijders_DDoS_Damage_Control.pdf>

-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net>

Follow-Ups:
- Getting hit hard by CHINANET
  - From: colinj at gt86car.org.uk (Colin Johnston)
- Getting hit hard by CHINANET
  - From: ecrogers at precisionds.com (Eric Rogers)

References:
- Getting hit hard by CHINANET
  - From: ter.devor at gmail.com (Terrance Devor)
- Getting hit hard by CHINANET
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Roland Dobbins)
- Getting hit hard by CHINANET
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Getting hit hard by CHINANET
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Roland Dobbins)
- Getting hit hard by CHINANET
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Getting hit hard by CHINANET
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Roland Dobbins)
- Getting hit hard by CHINANET
  - From: colinj at gt86car.org.uk (Colin Johnston)
- Getting hit hard by CHINANET
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Roland Dobbins)

Prev by Date: Getting hit hard by CHINANET
Next by Date: Getting hit hard by CHINANET
Previous by thread: Getting hit hard by CHINANET
Next by thread: Getting hit hard by CHINANET
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread