[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
- Subject: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
- From: mfidelman at meetinghouse.net (Miles Fidelman)
- Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 09:10:06 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAO1bj=bNgvdW_42ceXYc-o86g2cx4afAzk=MGJ7f1yPK709OaA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <13952758.7865.1425055485506.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <9578293AE169674F9A048B2BC9A081B4015725DE77@MUNPRDMBXA1.medline.com> <CAMrdfRxc268RnSN0btyC2LLFs9UspJJ4Qm0H0FBe2ZbCinvhtg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAMrdfRy8hWGq0gOr_8r1zhpw+EWa143eJofsmCh=UwtzTLssbA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAMrdfRw-BUPQa=Qo6QWffp7_NwUNbcA17wzMN=RSLHiVjJeVCg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAMrdfRz9vHR7jmR=aUeYopEEctmLFh8KkN2CW2+oApSOFFUyeg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAO1bj=bNgvdW_42ceXYc-o86g2cx4afAzk=MGJ7f1yPK709OaA@mail.gmail.com>
Aled Morris wrote:
>
> Sadly we don't have many "killer applications" for symmetric residential
> bandwidth, but that's likely because we don't have the infrastructure to
> incubate these applications.
>
Come to think of it, if USENET software wasn't so cumbersome, I kind of
wonder if today's "social network" would consist of home servers running
NNTP - and I expect the traffic would be very symmetric. (For that
matter, with a few tweaks, the USENET model would be great for
"groupware" - anybody remember the Netscape communications server that
added private newsgroups and authentication to the mix?)
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra