[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Working with Spamhaus

Subject: Working with Spamhaus
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:54:58 -0400
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 01 Aug 2015 04:48:11 +0900." <m24mkk9khw.wl%[email protected]>
References: <CAAARkvKXqPG991hA3fFQZ3DPaJ0sNMQOj-ZrWJVM_U6rEAGpnw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <SN1PR08MB14382D07A9C1C2EAE7E334A8838B0@SN1PR08MB1438.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <m24mkk9khw.wl%[email protected]>

On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 04:48:11 +0900, Randy Bush said:
> > As for SORBS, I'm not aware of anyone that uses it these days
>
> many folk do

Many of them your competitors? :)  (Sorry, couldn't resist :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20150731/ec01aaf6/attachment.pgp>

References:
- Working with Spamhaus
  - From: contact at nullivex.com (Bryan Tong)
- Working with Spamhaus
  - From: nobody at snovc.com (Private Sender)
- Working with Spamhaus
  - From: michael.holstein at csuohio.edu (Michael O Holstein)
- Working with Spamhaus
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)

Prev by Date: Working with Spamhaus
Next by Date: Working with Spamhaus
Previous by thread: Working with Spamhaus
Next by thread: Working with Spamhaus
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread