[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

de-peering for security sake

Subject: de-peering for security sake
From: clayton at mnsi.net (Clayton Zekelman)
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 17:12:04 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CAN9qwJ8pWP0SSJFg9e2-9hHsFV16bViQ9_OVQ4wbGXgqtBUBMw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7AVPVpJqDcB_A4w_VTxnb14Eqh1TnpRWxN8MJaJ5_h2ww@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAGbD49qqRdt8kU79fC7yS2VWj1MweO8+1R80_NW2oqp9rWzznw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7AZCbj=50pmb_AkT2BGGRAGkvrThhH7goxYKCwsBX8S-g@mail.gmail.com> <CAD8GWsvXAz_T7YouEQCaA88wGVyx6aokpCMZAFKwMByDq8suDg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPkb-7BdST2pbcrDEeSRmj29oLwP_0w+m8-ya7Ztk1PB071u+w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Just an off the cuff thought but if the format of the abuse messages could be standardized so handling them would be semi-automated somewhat like ACNS notices, it might improve response.

Maybe such a format already exists and just isn't widely used.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 25, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 25 Dec 2015, Colin Johnston wrote:
>> 
>> why do the chinese network folks never reply and action abuse reports, normal slow speed network abuse is tolerated, but not high speed deliberate abuse albeit compromised machines
> 
> This is not a chinese problem, this is a general ISP problem. Most ISPs do not respond to abuse reports.
> 
> -- 
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se

Follow-Ups:
- de-peering for security sake
  - From: hugo at slabnet.com (Hugo Slabbert)
- de-peering for security sake
  - From: tshaw at oitc.com (TR Shaw)

References:
- Broadband Router Comparisons
  - From: lorell at hathcock.org (Lorell Hathcock)
- Broadband Router Comparisons
  - From: josh at imaginenetworksllc.com (Josh Luthman)
- Broadband Router Comparisons
  - From: lorell at hathcock.org (Lorell Hathcock)
- Broadband Router Comparisons
  - From: rs-lists at seastrom.com (Rob Seastrom)
- Broadband Router Comparisons
  - From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- Broadband Router Comparisons
  - From: lists at mtin.net (Justin Wilson)
- Broadband Router Comparisons
  - From: jason at thebaughers.com (Jason Baugher)
- de-peering for security sake
  - From: colinj at gt86car.org.uk (Colin Johnston)
- de-peering for security sake
  - From: dcorbe at hammerfiber.com (Daniel Corbe)
- de-peering for security sake
  - From: list at satchell.net (Stephen Satchell)
- de-peering for security sake
  - From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- de-peering for security sake
  - From: ler762 at gmail.com (Lee)
- de-peering for security sake
  - From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- de-peering for security sake
  - From: colinj at gt86car.org.uk (Colin Johnston)
- de-peering for security sake
  - From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)

Prev by Date: de-peering for security sake
Next by Date: de-peering for security sake
Previous by thread: de-peering for security sake
Next by thread: de-peering for security sake
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread