[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Nat

Subject: Nat
From: Lee at asgard.org (Lee Howard)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:21:28 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <D29747F0.11F8D4%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAAbPayKVqf7r=77Jjks8WJOgm5eqFpD4OqUyTopKBPa2TRvQNA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <m24mfhj2d1.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]>


On 12/16/15, 8:53 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Berry Mobley"
<nanog-bounces at nanog.org on behalf of berry at gadsdenst.org> wrote:

>At 08:22 PM 12/16/2015, Randy Bush wrote:
>> > We need to put some pain onto everyone that is IPv4 only.
>>
>>this is the oppress the workers so they will revolt theory.  load of
>>crap.
>>
>>make ipv6 easier to deploy, especially in enterprise.  repeat the
>>previous sentence 42 times.
>
>This. I'm in an enterprise with some stubborn vendors, and none of
>them are even talking about ipv6. It won't help me to move (and it
>won't help you to get well if you're here) if my users can't get to
>their stuff.


Can you dual-stack while you wait for them?
Can we help you push on those vendors?

Lee

>
>Berry 
>
>

References:
- Nat
  - From: ahmed.dalaali at hrins.net (Ahmed Munaf)
- Nat
  - From: Jason_Livingood at cable.comcast.com (Livingood, Jason)
- Nat
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- Nat
  - From: charles.lists at camonson.com (Charles Monson)
- Nat
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- Nat
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)

Prev by Date: Nat
Next by Date: Nat
Previous by thread: Nat
Next by thread: Nat
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread