[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Opinions on Cologix data centers?
- Subject: Opinions on Cologix data centers?
- From: contact at winterei.se (Paul S.)
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:32:25 +0900
- In-reply-to: <CAMOPTEwKYAwy4_tP0DHwODXeKGi3kw2W0HvFC=ciy=ZGqk4qNg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAMQ0et0Nhd_Va888KuFkhWGnQ=rDX-mJAvnn+AEnboKpszL9EA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMOPTEwKYAwy4_tP0DHwODXeKGi3kw2W0HvFC=ciy=ZGqk4qNg@mail.gmail.com>
I recommend them for everything other than the quality of their remote
hands. They could do with some improvements in this department.
We have space at Cologix Dallas (within Infomart), and it's all fine. We
run our own ASN too though, so no idea on the bandwidth side of things.
On 12/15/2015 06:12 AM, Oliver O'Boyle wrote:
> I used/inherited them in Montreal after they bought out a series of colos.
> The corporate management team is good and I would work with them again.
> They saw themselves as partners and not just a vendor. The local DC
> manager/team was honest and easy to work with and they were very
> knowledgeable.
>
> The quality of the facility and success of your projects depends in great
> deal on what they bought and what stage they are at in upgrading it. In my
> case, the original DC had some design issues they were battling with
> related to the previous owner + unplanned growth that forced some poor
> decisions. Cologix did, however, redesign everything and make some major
> investments in the facility. We saw improvements come out every few months.
>
> Oliver
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:00 PM, David H <ispcolohost at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello; was curious if anyone has opinions on Cologix? Any aspect would be
>> of interest; management, financials, colo quality (power, a/c, etc). The
>> specific facility I'm looking at is their Lakeland FL building which began
>> life under a company called Colo 5 that they purchased; it's only two years
>> old. They seem to have been on a buying spree recently with other colo
>> buildings.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> David
>>
>
>