[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric
- Subject: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 11:50:28 +0900
- In-reply-to: <CAEmG1=rc8HHAG6tfYtkuHi4J7vDdwEQ+ETojn0W5X0HD+8uzUA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7BHZQH9P1=9iNA=-rJ7nRf2qG+WEYmamrZ+qR9zsPcWKQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEmG1=r=QZ5C9MwdNB_xaoQSGzv_7DB4niTooj=QHhcFWDMcoQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2lh99zn45.wl%[email protected]> <CAEmG1=rc8HHAG6tfYtkuHi4J7vDdwEQ+ETojn0W5X0HD+8uzUA@mail.gmail.com>
> No, it's not an issue of A not peering
> with B, it's A selling "internet transit"
> for a known subset of the internet
> rather than the whole kit and kaboodle.
right. then hurricane and cogent should both
make clear that they do not provide ipv6 transit
to the entire internet.
randy