[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric
- Subject: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric
- From: josh at kyneticwifi.com (Josh Reynolds)
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 20:47:35 -0600
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7BHZQH9P1=9iNA=-rJ7nRf2qG+WEYmamrZ+qR9zsPcWKQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEmG1=r=QZ5C9MwdNB_xaoQSGzv_7DB4niTooj=QHhcFWDMcoQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2lh99zn45.wl%[email protected]> <CAPkb-7B4E8dojyNBjc4_e8q-GFp=ihY4d1OV0227+xi-shv8oA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
Is "tier" even a thing anymore?
On Dec 4, 2015 8:46 PM, "Paul S." <contact at winterei.se> wrote:
> It is worth noting that HE indeed provides the full view, it's the other
> side that has an issue.
>
> (Since HE isn't really a tier 1, their transit relationships with Telia
> and other carriers "save" them)
>
> Cogent -> HE dies with unreachable on the first hop though, and that's an
> issue for Cogent customers.
>
> On 12/5/2015 11:09 AM, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
>
>> On 5 December 2015 at 02:43, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>>
>> Or, if you feel that Cogent's stubborn insistence on partitioning the
>>>> global v6 internet
>>>>
>>> if A does not peer with B,
>>> then for all A and B
>>> they are evil partitioners?
>>>
>>> can we lower the rhetoric?
>>>
>>> They both loses on this. In fact anyone claiming tier 1 status loses
>> here,
>> because this illustrates why you can never be single homed on a tier 1
>> network. These guys simply do not have the full internet.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Baldur
>>
>
>