[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

Subject: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric
From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:51:49 -0500
In-reply-to: <CAHuchRCYVVHEQ2bvnhXKgT5vepDw-J0THx8cRkdxU_8BqHeHSQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAHuchRCYVVHEQ2bvnhXKgT5vepDw-J0THx8cRkdxU_8BqHeHSQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Jared Geiger <jared at compuwizz.net> wrote:
> Wouldn't this be a Net Neutrality issue now or would it fall on HE for not
> willing to buy transit to Cogent IPv6?

Wouldn't it fall on Cogent for being unwilling to buy transit from HE?
HE is the IPv6 leader in the game.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>

Follow-Ups:
- IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric
  - From: jwalter at weebly.com (Jeff Walter)

References:
- IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric
  - From: maxtul at netassist.ua (Max Tulyev)
- IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric
  - From: ryan at u13.net (Ryan Rawdon)
- IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric
  - From: jared at compuwizz.net (Jared Geiger)

Prev by Date: Ransom DDoS attack - need help!
Next by Date: Ransom DDoS attack - need help!
Previous by thread: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric
Next by thread: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread