[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time :-)

Subject: Why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time :-)
From: tmorizot at gmail.com (Timothy Morizot)
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 07:56:08 -0500
In-reply-to: <CAE_ug15xBA6TFmC7eCHHMx3i3QkgPxRQjOQRuZ-EQSMKut0nNA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE_ug15xBA6TFmC7eCHHMx3i3QkgPxRQjOQRuZ-EQSMKut0nNA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mar 27, 2014 8:01 PM, "Tim Durack" <tdurack at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> NANOG arguments on IPv6 SMTP spam filtering.
>
> Deutsche Telecom discusses IPv4->IPv6 migration:
>
> https://ripe67.ripe.net/presentations/131-ripe2-2.pdf
>
> Facebook goes public with their IPv4->IPv6 migration:
>
>
http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2014/03/facebooks-extremely-impressive-internal-use-of-ipv6/
>
> If you haven't started, you've got some work to do.

Indeed. Having been deeply involved leading the technical side of our
transition at my organiati

Follow-Ups:
- Why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time :-)
  - From: tmorizot at gmail.com (Timothy Morizot)
- Why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time : -)
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)

References:
- Why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time :-)
  - From: tdurack at gmail.com (Tim Durack)

Prev by Date: why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition
Next by Date: ARIN board accountability to network operators (was: RE: [arin-ppml] [arin-discuss] Term Limit Proposal)
Previous by thread: Why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time :-)
Next by thread: Why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time :-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread