[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition

Subject: why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition
From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 23:03:24 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

LoL


Spellcheck? Helping you correctly spell the incorrect word every time.

Owen

On Mar 26, 2014, at 1:03 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote:

> On 03/26/2014 03:56 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> 
>> Most of the phishing e-mails I've sent don't have a valid reply-to, from, or return-path; replying to them is effectively impossible, and the linked/attached/inlined payload is the attack vector.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> Blasted spellcheck.... Now that everybody has had a good laugh; I've not 'sent' *any* phishing e-mails, but I have *seen* plenty.  Argh.
>

References:
- why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition
  - From: lowen at pari.edu (Lamar Owen)

Prev by Date: IPv6 Security [Was: Re: misunderstanding scale]
Next by Date: IPv6 Security [Was: Re: misunderstanding scale]
Previous by thread: why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition
Next by thread: why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread