[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 address literals probably aren't SMTP either

Subject: IPv6 address literals probably aren't SMTP either
From: johnl at iecc.com (John R. Levine)
Date: 27 Mar 2014 00:28:49 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

> I'm not saying John Klensin shouldn't have a say in how the IPv6 address is 
> defined, but I do think it would be best for everyone to work it out in an 
> official place somewhere so that email software isn't doing the complete 
> opposite of everyone else.

Too late.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2314 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140327/284d330b/attachment.bin>

References:
- IPv6 address literals probably aren't SMTP either
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- IPv6 address literals probably aren't SMTP either
  - From: rdrake at direcpath.com (Robert Drake)

Prev by Date: IPv6 isn't SMTP
Next by Date: WISP or other options
Previous by thread: IPv6 address literals probably aren't SMTP either
Next by thread: IPv6 isn't SMTP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread