[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition
- Subject: why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:59:47 -0400
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:07:22 -0400." <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAAAwwbW+S8YNXwhjpBzAL=+sSO0xx+eiMm1qUzP4W-49Dj339Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:07:22 -0400, Lamar Owen said:
> it; get enough endusers with this problem and you'll get a class-action
> suit against OS vendors that allow the problem to remain a problem; you
> can get rid of the bots.
You *do* realize that the OS vendor can't really do much about users who click
on stuff they shouldn't, or reply to phishing emails, or most of the other
ways people *actually* get pwned these days?
Hint: Microsoft *tried* to fix this with UAC. The users rioted.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140326/536d95f4/attachment.bin>