[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

misunderstanding scale

Subject: misunderstanding scale
From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
Date: 26 Mar 2014 17:10:10 -0000
In-reply-to: <CALgnk9q073UqyCG-fjb6MD-p77hHkidFYnu26sbM9GFYmAXsaw@mail.gmail.com>

>It only takes a single entry if you do not store /128s but that /64. Yes,
>RBL lookups do not currently know how to handle this, but there are a
>couple of good proposals around on how to do it.

Sigh.  See previous note on wny aggregating on /64 won't work.

>This would also reduce the risks from cache depletion attacks via DNSxL
>lookups to IPv4 levels.

Sigh.  See previous note on wny aggregating on /64 won't work.

R's,
John

References:
- misunderstanding scale
  - From: matthias at leisi.net (Matthias Leisi)

Prev by Date: misunderstanding scale, SMTP edition
Next by Date: why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition
Previous by thread: misunderstanding scale
Next by thread: misunderstanding scale
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread