misunderstanding scale

[wbailey at satelliteintelligencegroup.com (Warren Bailey)]

FYI He tells everyone they?re cute. Don?t buy his tricks, he doesn?t call
back the next morning.

;)

Ps. Take it easy on each other. It?s the beginning of spring.. Head
outside.. Go have a beer.. Smoke a joint.. What I am getting at is.. It?s
possible you guys should relax and realize that in the grand scheme of
things a lot of this really doesn?t matter.

Go be humans beings in the world, the internet and this flame thread will
still be here as it has been for generations (internet generations,
anyways..)

Just my .02

WOOOOOSAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH


On 3/24/14, 4:53 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy at psg.com> wrote:

>>>> You propose stateless NAT64 as an viable alternative to CGN.
>    ^^^
>>> where do i do that?
>> Nick Hilliard
>
>ahh.  i see your error.  i am not nick hilliard.  he's the cute one.
>
>> Your reply (verbosity added for clarity): "[Sure it is! Unlike where
>> folks solve their problem with CGN, v6 to v4 protocol translation] can
>> be stateless."
>
>again, you put words in my mouth which were not there.  i did not say v6
>to v4 translation.
>
>> Nah, I'm done following bread crumbs for the day.
>
>cool.  then we can all go back to reality and whet people actually said.
>
>bye
>
>randy
>
>
>