[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Muni Fiber and Politics
- Subject: Muni Fiber and Politics
- From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:47:05 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAMrdfRwbt==G_vP24PntLbKMc2QNvU32e1m+w=-CKbnTGD8fmg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAMrdfRwbt==G_vP24PntLbKMc2QNvU32e1m+w=-CKbnTGD8fmg@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday, July 21, 2014 07:28:22 PM Scott Helms wrote:
> I'll be watching to see how well this roll out goes. If
> they didn't re-engineer their splits (or plan for
> symmetrical from the beginning) they could run into some
> problems because the total speed on a GPON port is
> asymmetrical, about 2.5 gbps down to 1.25 gbps up.
Symmetrical would be tough to do unless you're doing Active-
E.
Then again, I haven't been following PON in the last two
years, so maybe they have a solution now.
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140730/798acf23/attachment.pgp>