[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Carrier Grade NAT
- Subject: Carrier Grade NAT
- From: mpalmer at hezmatt.org (Matt Palmer)
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 06:05:35 +1000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAMDdSzNABh=OtkQn52xJLaY=h26Ho3Bkk54aVSJTXeDXsO30MQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:42:31AM -0500, Chris Boyd wrote:
> On Jul 29, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> > If law enforcement comes along without port numbers then you give them a
> > list of subscribers behind that IP at the time. Use port block
> > allocation and keep track of the blocks to reduce logging load.
>
> There's probably going to be some interesting legal fallout from that
> practice. As an ISP customer, I'd be furious to find out that my
> communications had been intercepted due to the bad behavior of another
> user.
Then you'll no doubt be happy to know that you're very, very unlikely to
ever find out.
- Matt