[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
5 too. Agglutinating multiple separate problems into a single complex title
2 regulation solution
Enough hot air driven thrust is being generated to ensure porcine aviation
too, as section 3 assures us.
On 26-Jul-2014 6:32 am, <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:10:09 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian said:
> > The debate is dominated by the parties of the first part unfortunately
> (and
> > add professors of law to this already toxic mix)
>
> So what you're saying is that the debate is in total violation of
> RFC1925, section 4? :)
>
- References:
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: pauldotwall at gmail.com (Paul WALL)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: william.allen.simpson at gmail.com (William Allen Simpson)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: ops.lists at gmail.com (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: brunner at nic-naa.net (Eric Brunner-Williams)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: ops.lists at gmail.com (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
- Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)