[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The case(s) for, and against, preemption (was Re: Muni Fiber and Politics)
- Subject: The case(s) for, and against, preemption (was Re: Muni Fiber and Politics)
- From: brunner at nic-naa.net (Eric Brunner-Williams)
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:06:15 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CALFTrnO9EnYtJ4RBYQo2Quern4KuuCae2_xV7o9V=GihyyTGsQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGWjUeX8oVaRFbGY2ycNZy7kHyMHtX=YHBznbM3pT-pDAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJvB4t=8k0tQGvnq5ZoKCicwNpER_aTqnBtqB0cck8cSTW7kwQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CALFTrnOLXNp+67zxAWTyxHNmpAj=TceT8LLQH71DDcntCLOCpg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CALFTrnO9EnYtJ4RBYQo2Quern4KuuCae2_xV7o9V=GihyyTGsQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/22/14 1:55 PM, Ray Soucy wrote:
> You're over-thinking it. Use the power company as a model and you'll
> close to the right path.
Well, no, but thanks for your thoughts.
Portland vs. Cumberland County as respective hypothetical bonding and
regulating authorities, not {Bangor Hydro|Florida Power & Light|...} and
Central Maine Power, generators and distributor, respectively.
Eric